Keep property commitments
from slipping through.

One view of what needs attention.

The proposed product would connect property obligations with their dates, source records, and responsible person, so an owner can see what is approaching, overdue, or still unresolved.

• Lease expiries. Track the term end and source-linked notice or renewal conditions.
• Unpaid rent. Compare due dates with supplied payment records and keep unconfirmed payments distinct from verified arrears.
• Insurance renewals. Keep policy dates and renewal tasks visible.
• Vendor commitments. Track agreed visits, work, and evidence of delivery.
• Maintenance resolution. Follow an issue from reporting to an assigned owner and confirmed closure.

Make every reminder checkable.

A useful record would show the property, obligation, applicable date, source, responsible person, and next action. A maintenance ticket marked complete should retain evidence that the issue was resolved.

Missing payment evidence should invite a check, rather than automatically establish a default. A date or obligation should be verified against the applicable agreement and circumstances before action relies on it.

Start with your actual portfolio.

The intended inputs are lease dates and terms, rent schedules, payment records, insurance dates, vendor commitments, and maintenance issue history. The initial enquiry form asks only for a description of the problem.

We would agree the supported records, pilot scope, handling of confidential information, and price before any paid review or monitoring begins.

Test whether the record helps.

The first workflow should reveal whether people acted before a deadline, clarified a payment, verified a vendor’s delivery, or resolved a maintenance issue. Reminders sent, tasks completed, and money received remain separate outcomes.

The proposed monthly test range is US$39–$199 depending on portfolio. No payment is collected on this site.